Economic advice, method- and data-based

The decarbonisation of heat supply poses technical and financial challenges for gas network operators. Using the example of a municipality, RZVN and Polynomics demonstrate how a structured, holistic planning model can define the available scope for action and provide a basis for decision-making. The integral analysis model links technical target network planning – including sales scenarios, network development and hydraulic verification – with the financial modelling of cost and tariff trends. By simulating various financial and planning measures, network operators can anticipate unfavourable tariff developments and take corrective action at an early stage.

Geopolitical tensions, volatile energy prices, and ambitious climate targets continue to put pressure on the energy market. European natural gas prices have risen significantly in the short term due to the conflict in the Middle East, but far less sharply than during the 2022 energy price crisis triggered by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The futures market (TTF futures) currently anticipates a marked easing of the market by 2030. The short-term increase in natural gas prices temporarily strengthens the competitiveness of renewable gases. To enhance this competitiveness, the European Union has defined various strategic directions. In neighboring countries, the competitiveness of biomethane injection into the gas grid is currently improved by the fact that grid connection costs are not borne exclusively by producers but are partly socialized through the network. As long as no federal Gas Market Act (Gas-VG) is in force, the Swiss gas industry plays a key role in regulating cost allocation and the market integration of biomethane. According to the DeCIRRA research project, whether and where renewable gases can be used effectively depends strongly on local infrastructure, resources, and available alternatives—uniform target models fall short. In cantons where energy legislation is closely aligned with MoPEC 2025, the use of renewable gases in the building sector is significantly restricted. In contrast, Germany adopts a more open transformation pathway in its Building Modernisation Act, based on the so-called “Biotreppe” (bio-step mechanism), although its specific timeline remains subject to considerable uncertainty.

How do Swiss companies handle non-personal and personal data? Is there a market for data, and in which areas do companies see a need for action? To answer these questions, the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IPI) commissioned Polynomics to conduct a survey of around 800 companies. Key findings on non-personal data: Despite an increase in data generation, its economic importance has declined. Although companies now have a better understanding of which non-personal data are available, they are used and demanded less than five years ago. Accordingly, the trade in such data has also lost importance. Key findings on personal data: Companies collect large amounts of personal data but make little use of them to develop new products or services. Demand and trade in personal data are low. Companies rarely share personal data; when they do, they are more likely to share it with public authorities or the research community than with commercial third parties. Overall, companies face few barriers to data access and do not actively call for additional regulations.